THE PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING

 
PART THREE: THE PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING

Chapter 15

LEARNING


The Chapter at a Glance
 A wide and comprehensive concept.
Theories of learning.
Laws of learning.
Significant factors in learning.
Achievement of a gifted child.
The case of a poor reader.
Remembering and forgetting.
Human and animal learning.

Learning is the process of modification of human behavior through experience and training. The change that takes place in the learner is manifested in the form of a habit, outlook, atti­tude, skill, understanding, knowledge, mastery, insight, etc.

A Wide and Comprehensive Concept

Learning is not simply the acquiring of proficiency in school subjects or skill in vocations. It is rather any modification tak­ing place in any field of an individual's life. Learning has often been defined as acquiring of knowledge and information. This narrow and academic definition is very misleading. One cannot deny the significance of knowledge and information in learning. That, however, is not the whole of learning. It is a wide and a comprehensive concept which embraces the full education of a child in the widest possible sense of the word.
Learning also involves the assimilation of the learned material and its intelligent use in one's daily life. An individual whose mind is stuffed with vast funds of knowledge and infor­mation but who does not possess the necessary wisdom to apply this knowledge to his development and the welfare of humanity cannot be regarded a learned or an educated person.

Basic Elements of Learning
We have defined learning as modification taking place in human behavior. It may, however, be remembered that every modification is not necessarily learning. The two basic elements involved in all learning are as fol­lows :—
(1) Consciousness of modification.
(2) Dynamism of the learning process.

(1) Consciousness of Modification: The learner must be conscious of the modifications taking place in him as a result of learning. A student, for instance, attending a class in arithmetic must be aware of the modifications in his arithmetical knowledge that take place as a result of his attending the class.
(2) Dynamism of the Learning Process: Learning is a dynamic process. All the modifications that take place in an individual during the course of his learning become an active or a dynamic part of his personality. No learning material ever remains static or dead, making no influence or impact on lear­ner's personality. Learning rather is always active and dynamic.
Thus the knowledge and training in subjects, attitudes, values, etc. that an individual acquires invariably become a part and parcel of his personality. They influence his thought and behavior one way or the other. Tests and examinations are one of the methods of measuring the extent to which the dynamism of learning is operative in the learner.

Theories of Learning

A large variety of conflicting theories and bitter arguments of their exponents have remained quite an interesting pheno­menon for a long time in the field of psychology of learning. Psychologists interested in learning were identified to one theory or another. Their theories were opposed to each other from top to bottom. This tendency to adhere rigidly to one theory of learning has now disappeared. Contemporary psychologists pre­fer more to argue about methods of learning, fruitful areas for research and experimentation rather than merely verbalize about universal theories.
However, a brief account of these theories is very revealing from academic and historical point of views. Gist of some of the noteworthy theories of learning is presented below:
            (1) Association Theory:
This rather philosophical theory propounds that ideas pro­vide the units or elements of our mental life. These ideas follow one another in a constant chain. Learning takes place as a result of association of one idea with the other and so on. The stron­ger and pleasanter the association of ideas, the stronger the learning.

(2) Gestalt Theory:
Unlike the Association theory which is analytical in natur, this theory is holistic in its approach. The Gestalt theory highlights the significance of insight, understanding and orga­nization of the whole of the material to be learnt in order to make the learning process really effective and efficient. Kohler, Katona, Wertheimer and Kofka have conducted enlightening re­searches and experiments to prove their contention that it is organization and understanding of the whole material that leads to effective learning.

(3) Biological Theories:
A number of biological theories of learning have also been propounded. The exponents of these theories emphasize that learning is a fundamental biological phenomenon. They hold that in the ultimate analysis changes in behavior brought about by learning are reflections of changes which must occur within the central nervous system. Subscribers to this view point have conducted enormous amount of experimental work on the re­lationship between the nervous system and learning. It may, however, be added that such a work has not yet established anything concretely.

Laws of Learning
Learning proceeds under certain laws. Various educational psychologists have enunciated these laws variously. The first comprehensive formulation of the laws of learning, however, grew out of Thorndike's experiments on learning in animals.

Thorndike's Laws of Learning
Thorndike enumerates the following three laws of learn­ing:-
(1) The Law of Effect.
(2) The Law of Exercise or Frequency.
(3) The Law of Readiness.
(1) The Law of Effect: This law holds that success leads to the repetition of a response and failure to its elimination. That is why this law is sometimes called "the law of satisfac­tion and annoyance." In Thorndike's own words the law runs as : "When a modifiable connection between a situation and a response is made and is accompanied or followed by a satisfying state of affairs, that connection's strength is increased; when made or accompanied or followed by an annoying state of affairs, its strength is decreased.
(2) The Law of Exercise: This law states that other things being equal repetition of any response tends to establish or con­firm it. In other words the law emphasizes the old saying that "practice makes perfect.
(3) The Law of Readiness: This law holds that when a learner is in a state of readiness to learn, the learning process is more pleasant and effective. Conversely, when the learner is not in a state of readies, the learning is annoying and ineffec­tive.

Significant Factors in Learning

The process of learning is influenced by a variety of factors. Knowledge of these factors can prove very enlightening for teachers and parents in understanding and guiding the process of learning among children.
Some of the significant factors that influence the learning process and that have been discussed in the following pages are:--

(1) Readiness.
(2) Motivation.
(3) Interest.
 (4) Attention.
(5) Drill or Practice.
(6) Fatigue and Boredom.
(7) Intelligence.
(8) Aptitude.
(9) Attitude.
(10) Emotional Factors.
(11) Family and Cultural Expectancies.

(1) Readiness for Learning:
Readiness means a state of preparedness. Unless a child is ready or prepared or capable to learn, no home or class instruc­tion can be of any avail to him.
Differences in Readiness: We have already seen in an ear­lier chapter on Individual differences that children differ widely from each other in several aspects. These individual variations also determine their readiness for learning. Thus children of the same age and studying in the same class are not necessarily all at the same stage of readiness to learn. The degree of their readiness is determined by such factors as physical growth, range of experiences, social and emotional stability, etc. A teacher should, therefore, endeavor to understand these and other factors that determine children's readiness for learning in order to make his class instruction successful and effective.
Utility of Understanding Readiness: An adequate under­standing of the factors determining readiness for learning among children should enable the teacher to:
(a) Improve his teaching methods so as to meet the re­quirements of students of varying degrees of readi­ness in the class;
(b) Provide them with incentives to improve and to in­crease their readiness, and
(c) Build up readiness in those children who seem to be disinclined to participate in the class instruction.

(2) Motivation for Learning:
Motivation also plays a vital role in the learning process. Every learner has some sort of a purpose or a goal in view which motivates him to learn. Thus a student might be motivated to work hard because he wants to earn his livelihood after obtain­ing certain amount of academic qualifications. A scholar might be motivated to learn a new language because it helps him in his research projects. Absence of any motivation makes adverse effect on the quality and speed of learning. A rich man's son who has neither an internal desire nor an outward necessity to learn will make little progress in studies:

(3) Interest and Learning:
Interest also plays a great role in learning. The various interests of the students can be exploited to facilitate their learn­ing. Interests during early infancy, as we have already seen, are mostly limited and short-lived. As the child grows older his interests diversify and stabilize. A school teacher should have knowledge of various interests of children. He can eliminate much drudgery; monotony and boredom from school work if he makes his instruction lively and stimulating and arouses student interest in it.
Better Results through Interest: Once pupils' interest is aroused in an activity they can expend more effort on it. No learning can be achieved without proper expenditure of effort on it. Students can even face distraction, fatigue and boredom if they feel interested in class instruction and its allied activities. It has often been found that, in most cases, fatigue in reality is loss of interest in the activity in hand. Interest, therefore, can be exploited to yield results of greater quantity and quality in the learning situations in school and everywhere.
Conflict and Balance of Interests: Life is so exciting that many interesting things and activities often clamor to attract our attention at one and the same time. Children frequently face a dilemma of mutually conflicting interests. Immediate interests often seem to be clashing with the remoter ones. Sporting in­terests, for instance, might conflict with scholarly interests. A student might thus feel in a quandary at least for the time being when his interest in sports impels him towards the play-field and his interest in studies forces him to concentrate on books.
            In such cases of confecting interests a lot of hesitancy, wastage, frustration and unhappiness are bound to follow. What is needed is an education at home and school which should discipline children to achieve a healthy balance in their interests. They should be trained to budget their time in such a manner as to pay a reasonable to all the various interests__ scholastic, athletic, social, etc., within the time at their disposal.
            Using Interest to Facilitate Learning: Blair et al have suggested the following techniques for utilizing interests in order to facilitate learning:
(1)               Interesting teaching methods.
(2)               Purposive learning.
(3)               Student participation

(1)               Interesting Teaching Methods: The teacher should endeavor to make his teaching interesting and inspiring. The material to be learned should be placed in an interesting and, if possible, a novel context. Audio-visual aids, group discussion, even illustrative games, etc. could be utilized to make it more interesting and engaging.
(2)               Purposive Learning: if the students are able to see that the learning is purposive and leading to a precise goal they can invest more interest and effort into it. The material to be learned should, therefore, be so placed before the students by the teacher as to enable them to realize that it is a necessary step towards the achievement of a definite purpose or goal in life.
(3)               Student Participation: The class room atmosphere should be so pleasant, permissive, friendly and stimulating that every pupil is encouraged to participate actively in its entire doings.

(4) Attention and Learning:  The role of attention in learning is too obvious. No learning is possible without attention. The quality and quantity of attention determines to a very considerable extent the quality and quantity of the material to be learnt. Distraction impairs the progress of learning very seriously.
(5) Place of Drill or Practice: Simple material is usually easily learned. It does not involve much practice, drill, exercise, repetition, etc. More complex and difficult material, however, needs practice and repeated exercises. The teacher should, therefore, give enough practice to the class, determining its quantity and frequency by the nature of the material that they are learning.
Drilling is not parroting. Care should, however, be taken not to turn practice or drill work into unintelligent parroting. Even when drilling or repeating aloud, the students should be trained to keep their eyes constantly on the meaningful aspect of the matter. They must do every learning practice with due attention and interests, making it as pleasant as possible.

(6) Fatigue and Boredom: It is usually boredom or lassitude rather than fatigue which bothers the learners. The difference between the two is that fatigue is mental or physical decrease in efficiency and compe­tency to do work.    Boredom, on the other hand, is a lack of desire to do work or an aversion for it.   Such an aversion makes one feel fatigued without being actually fatigued.    Studying seldom causes fatigue.   It is mainly boredom, causing the impres­sion of fatigue, which decreases student efficiency in learning.
Causes of Fatigue and Boredom:   In a class-room situation the following factors might result in the feeling of fatigue and even in producing actual fatigue:
 (a)      Boring and un-stimulating teaching methods.
 (b)      Defective   physical   environment,    e.g., inadequate lighting, extremes of temperature or humidity, un­hygienic conditions, etc.
 (c)      Subnormal bodily conditions of the learner, e.g., malnutrition, anemia, temporary or
             permanent physical ailments, discomforts, etc.
 (d)      Emotional disturbances, e.g. tensions, conflicts, frustrations and other emotionally     
             disturbing conditions.    
Prevention and treatment:   A systematic prevention and treatment would involve a diagnosis of all possible causes that produce fatigue and boredom, and adoption of proper methods to meet them. As a general rule, however, an interest in the subject-matter, an enthusiastic attitude towards it and a strong will to achieve success in it wards off fatigue and boredom even in most unfavorable conditions.
(7) The Role of Intelligence: Intelligence affects the quality and quantity of one's learning very considerably. The results of intelligence tests prove very helpful in determining what can or should be expected of various children at various levels of their development.
Let us now discuss the influence of the following levels of intelligence on the learning of children:
(a) Inferior intelligence.
(b) Average intelligence.
(c) Superior intelligence.
(d) Exceptionally high intelligence.
(a)       Inferior Intelligence and Learning: Children of inferior intelligence may be roughly divided into the following five sub-classes, all falling within the I. Q. range of 0 to 89. None of these categories of children are capable of deriving any sub­stantial benefit from normal learning:
(i)    Idiots with an I.Q range of ………………….    0-19
(ii)   Imbeciles with an I.Q range of ……………….20-40
(iii)  Morons with an I.Q range of ………………….50-69
(iv)  Border Line cases with an I.Q range or ……..70-79
(v)   Dull average children with I.Q ….range of...80-89

(i)                Idiot Children: Children with I. Q. of 19 or less are technically known as idiots.
Numerically they are very rare. Idiot children are essentially incapable of learning anything.
(ii)              Imbecile Children: Those children whose I. Q. ranges from 20 to 49 are termed as imbeciles. Such children are cap­able of very meager learning. It is absolutely futile to teach them to read, spell or learn arithmetic, etc.
     (iii)             Moron Children: Morons are those children who fall within the I. Q. range of 50—69. Such children can make a little progress in learning if they are placed in exceptionally simple learning situations and if the patient teacher makes stren­uous and continuous efforts with them. The morons falling in the I. Q. range of 50—60 are particularly incapable of achiev­ing any genuine comprehension in the field of riding, arithmetic, etc.
All of the three foregoing categories of inferior children, ranging in I. Q. from 0 to 69, fall
under the group of the mentally deficient children.
     (iv) Border-Line   Children:    Those   children whose I.Q. ranges from 70 to 79 are known as borderline cases. Such children also experience great difficulties in learning. In fact it is impossible to impart regular instruction in a regular school to a child with an I.Q below 75.
     (v) Dull Children: Children who fall within the I. Q. range of 80—89 are technically known as dull average children. Studies conducted by Burt reveal that dull children experience great difficulty in keeping pace with the average and brighter children in the class. Teachers and parents of such children should, therefore, refrain from imposing ambitious academic demands on them.
     (b) Average Intelligence and Learning: Children with aver­age intelligence belong to the I. Q. range of 90—109, i.e., those I. Q. clusters round about 100. Such children do fairly well at school except in the more abstract aspects of learning.
      (c)             Superior Intelligence and Learning: A child within the I. Q. range of 110—119 is superior in intelligence. Superior children usually keep up with the class without demanding much attention and effort from the teacher.
Children coming within the I. Q. range of 120—139 are very superior in intelligence. Very superior children possess a lot of initiative and self-direction. They are, therefore, apt to be neglected by the teachers who tend to think that such children do not need any attention, help, or guidance.
(d)       Exceptionally High Intelligence and Learning: Excep­tionally superior children are about 140 in I. Q. Such gifted children make exceptional achievement in most learning situa­tions. Their giftedness is indicated even at an early stage of their life. Some of these early indications are as follows:—
(i) Exceptional intellectual curiosity.
(ii) Wealth of miscellaneous information.
             (iii) A burning desire to learn to read.

Achievements of a Gifted Child

The following account of the educational achievements of an exceptionally intelligent child is presented by Hollingsworth. The child’s chronological age is 8 years 5 months. He has an I.Q. of 187.
 
Exceptional Language Proficiency: In addition to his regular school work the child has covered the following special work in language and mathematics, either with the general guidance of a tutor or his mother. In Geometry and Algebra he has gone as far as equations. In Latin he has acquired partial knowledge of the four declensions and can read easy matter. He worked out the Greek alphabet him­self from an astronomical chart, between the ages of five and six year. In French language his proficiency equals to that achieved in about two years ordinary schooling. He is capable of holding ordinary conversation in German. He has attended Spanish classes with his mother and can read and understand it. He possesses reading knowledge of Italian and can hold simple conversations in it. As he could not get adequate facilities for learning Portuguese, he asked his mother to learn it. He is a beginner in Hebrew and Anglo-Saxon.
Exceptionally Keen Observation: He displays a very keen interest in Astronomy and has worked out all the constellations from Mac-Cready. One evening he noticed a new planet near the Twins. He said it was Saturn. Mother thought it to be Mars. He worked out the position from the "astronomical chart and found that the planet was Saturn. He has a great interest in nature. History is his chief and absorbing school subject.
His writing, however, is not equal to his other accomplishments. He is a slow writer. For this reason he dictates most of his "home work" to a stenographer.

Intelligence and Scholastic Achievement: Most of the studies have highlighted a high and positive correlation, on the whole, between intelligence and scholastic achievement. Parents and teachers should, therefore, realize the practical significance of such a correlation. They should assign such learning tasks to children as are appropriate to the level of their intelligence.

(8) Aptitude and Learning:
Aptitude is one of the most fundamental determinants of the learning process. A learner who possesses aptitude or natural liking for a particular subject of study or material will learn it better and retain it longer. On the other hand, he will require relatively longer period of time to study a subject for which he lacks natural aptitude. He is liable to forget it soon besides feeling bored and unhappy all the time while learning it. Hence it is extremely desirable to analyze aptitude of children before prescribing courses of study for them.

(9) Attitude and Learning:
The learning process is also influenced considerably by the attitude of the learner. If the learner is alert, attentive and interested in the material to be learnt he is bound to have a favorable attitude towards it. Such an attitude will enable him to tackle the learning situation economically, pleasantly and effectively. Conversely, if he is slack, inattentive and uninterested in the material his attitude is bound to be unfavorable. This will hinder the smooth learning of the material in hand besides involving undue strain and tension in the Learner.

(10) Influence of Emotional Factors:
Desirable emotional conditions enhance the quality and speed of learning. Happiness, joy and satisfaction are always favorable for any type of learning. Adverse emotional factors, on the other hand, hinder learning. Many studies have estab­lished the fact that emotional strain, stress, tensions, disturbances, etc.,  are extremely inimical to scholastic pursuits.
Common Emotional Provocations: The most common emo­tional provocations which have been observed to interfere with smooth learning among children are as follows:
(i)        Unfulfilled needs.
(ii)       Wrong parental attitudes at home.
(iii)       Disturbances, difficulties, inadequacies, insecurities, etc. connected with home
                    life.
   (iv)   Inferiority   and   frustration   resulting   from   real   or imaginary physical defect
             or deformity.
(v)              Previous experiences of school failure.
(vi)            Humiliating attitude of the teachers and class-mates.

The Role of the Teacher: An understanding teacher can help children immensely in overcoming their emotional impedi­ments to learning.  An adverse attitude on the part of the teacher may aggravate rather than alleviate the emotional in­hibitions of young learners.   It may thus put a serious obstacle in the way of their scholastic progress.

The Case of a Poor Reader

That a teacher may contribute towards a child's emotional difficulties and thereby impede learning is illustrated by the fol­lowing example:

             “When I was in an Elementary School, I was rather nervous and high strung. I was tall and very thin. The thing I remember and I shall never forget was an incident that happened in about the fifth grade. I wasn’t a very good reader and I think that this was partly due to the fact that I was shy and didn’t like to be made fun of. I was called upon to read. Things were moving along fairly well until I made one mistake and it seemed everyone in room was laughing at me. This caused me to make more mistakes. My teacher said, ’that will do, fine, I guess you will never learn to read’.” 

These few humiliating words by the teacher which the child will “never forget” proved a great obstacle in his learning.          

(11) The Role of Family and Culture:
Family and cultural expectancies also influence learning very considerably. The influence of family and culture on various aspects of children has already been worked out in detail in two separate chapters in Part Two.
Family Expectancy and Learning: A child's learning is greatly influenced by the ambitions and aspirations of his parents. The family expectancies vary from culture to culture and from region to region.
Lower Class Families: In our country the parents in lower class families are mostly illiterate. Owing to abject poverty the children are expected to assume adult responsibilities too early. These factors leave little opportunity for poor children to join a school and devote time to scholastic pursuits. Consequently, very few children from poor families are able to derive any sub­stantial benefit from school instruction.
Middle Class Families: In middle class families, on the other hand, parents are rather over-ambitious academically. They wish their children to make quick academic progress, grow up and find a respectable vocation, preferably a white collar job. Such children, therefore, get sufficient incentive from their fami­lies. This, of course, is most favorable to scholastic learning, although an overdose of family emphasis on acquiring academic degrees might affect the child's mental and physical health adversely.
Upper Class Families: The upper class families, however, are not very much bothered about educating their children for economic or utilitarian purposes. They are more anxious to impart such instruction to their children as it nourishes their feel­ing of superiority, their consciousness of their prestige and the idea that they are the ruling class. Upper class parents, there­fore, are usually keen to send their children to specialized educa­tional institutions of a princely type. Such institutions mostly fail to introduce the child to those democratic values which are the true essence and foundation of any learning.
The Role of Culture: Similarly, cultural demands and ex­pectancies also influence learning. The spirit of a culture is reflected in its social and educational institutions. Children's learning, therefore, is greatly determined by the demands and expectancies of their culture. Thus, for instance, in an indus­trialized culture the emphasis mostly centers round mechanical sciences and preparing children for highly mechanized vocations. In an agricultural country, on the other hand, the educational process focuses its attention on preparing children for those skills which are suited to meet the needs of an agrarian com­munity.

The Philosophical Aspect of Culture: The ideational and the philosophical element of culture also influence the spirit of children's learning. Thus children in a democratic culture tend to acquire democratic values and attitudes. A feudal, aristocra­tic or dictatorial culture, on the other hand, promotes autocratic modes of thought and behavior.
Learning by Doing and Playing
Children are apt to achieve more if the learning methods involve interesting movements, playful activities, etc. A class instruction which is predominantly oral has little chance of making any considerably substantial and permanent addition to their knowledge and information.
Modern teaching methods, therefore, are putting more and more emphasis on learning by doing and playing. Certain specialized teaching techniques have recently been formulated which tend to turn the class-room into a sort of a workshop or a play-field. These educational techniques will be dealt with in detail in the next chapter.
Permanence of Learning
(Remembering & Forgetting)
All that we learn is not equally or permanently retained. Some material is forgotten immediately after learning, other retained for a few days, and still other might be retained practically forever.   The quality, quantity and speed of remembering and forgetting depend upon several factors. Some of these factors are presented for consideration in the following pages.
Factors in Forgetting
Ebbinghaus has done pioneer quantitative work on the psychology of remembering and forgetting. Mainly due to his research it has now been established that nonsense or meaningless material is usually forgotten very soon. Significant and meaningful material, e.g., poetry, interesting stories, etc., is retained for a relatively longer period.
The Learning Method: Much depends upon the method of learning. The evidence of research and experiment shows that if the learner arranges the material in order, grasps the meaning of the whole, sees the relationships between various parts and commits it to memory intelligently he has less chance of for­getting it very quickly.
The Role of Interest: The amount of interest taken in the material to be committed to memory also determines the degree of forgetfulness. If the memorization is accompanied by the interest, keenness and enthusiasm of the learner it is forgotten very slowly. Similarly, a learning situation which involves in­teresting movements, playful activities, etc., has far more chance to prevent or decrease forgetfulness than a boring learning ex­perience which is devoid of any exciting and engaging element.
Retention of the Learned Material: Some of the significant factors that favor retention of the learned material are as follows:
(1)       Recitation: Occasional recitations are very helpful in retaining the learned material especially for young children.
(2)       Vividness of the Material: If the presented material is either vivid in itself or is made so by the teacher or the learner himself it is better retained.
(3)       Meaningfulness: When the learner is able to grasp the meaning and spirit of the material to be learned it is easily memorized and retained for a longer time.
(1)       The Method of Learning: Out of several methods of learning the following two have been found to favor retention:—
(a) The Whole Method.
(b) The Spacing Method.
The whole method of learning consists in grasping the meaning and significance of the whole of the matter from the beginning to the end instead of dividing it into self-contained parts.
The spacing method involves the spacing of the learning period by suitable intervals of rest or engagement in a different type of activity.
(5)       Conditions of Learning: Better physical conditions lead to better and more permanent learning. Similarly, a better emotional state in the learner also promotes learning and reten­tion. Physical disease or defect, emotional disturbance, un­congenial environment, etc., are unfavorable for retention of the learned material.
(6)       Specific School Conditions: Certain specific factors in the school also influence retention among children. The school building, the quality of the discipline and the personality of the teacher make a considerable influence on the retention of the learned material. A school, for instance, which is housed in un-stimulating and depressing premises, where the discipline is lax, arbitrary or inconsistent and where the teacher is a mal­adjusted or an incompetent person, is inimical to learning. Such adverse school conditions are extremely unfavorable for the long retention of the class instruction in the mind of the learner.

Human and Animal Learning
It may be kept in mind that learning and remembering are not the exclusive monopoly of human beings. Animals, too, learn and remember a lot. Innumerable experiments have been conducted on animal learning. The most commonly-used sub­jects in such experiments have been rats and monkeys. The learning process of chimpanzees has been found to be very close to that of human beings.
Human beings, however, are far superior to animals in learn­ing and remembering. Woodworth and   Marquis mention the following as the main points which establish human superiority over animals in the field of learning.
(1)       Better Observation:
Human beings are better observers. They are better able to discern the salient features of persons, objects and situations than animals can do. Better observation facilitates learning and remembering. Animals are incapable of competing with human beings in observation.
(2)       Better Approach:
While learning, human beings make a better approach to­wards the material to be learned, by using deliberation manage­ment, control, etc. Animals are incapable of attacking their pro­blems in such an improved, refined and organized manner.
(3)       Use of Language:
Use of language, names, numbers, etc., by the human beings facilitates learning among them very considerably. Animals, on the contrary, are seriously handicapped in this respect.
(4)       Use of Ideation:
Human beings can think of persons, things and situations even in their absence. This ability is known as ideation or ab­stract thinking. It facilitates quick grasp and insight into things and situations. Animals are either incapable of or relatively inferior to man in this aspect as well.
Man, therefore, is definitely a far more capable learner than the animals. He can also remember the learned material better and for a longer period than the animals.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

Adiala Jail's monitoring is strict, meetings are limited, 3 members of the party will be allowed to meet Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf founder Imran Khan, Naeem Panjotha, Khalid Shafiq and Naseeruddin Nair.

Adiala Jail's monitoring is strict, meetings are limited, 3 members of the party will be allowed to meet Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf founde...