The Islamabad High Court stopped the accountability court from pronouncing the final verdict on the 190 million pounds case۔

The Islamabad High Court stopped the accountability court from pronouncing the final verdict on the 190 million pounds case A two-member bench comprising JusticeMian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb and Justice Babar Sattar issued a0notice to NAB and sought its reply. Islamabad The Islamabad High Court stopped the accountability court from pronouncing the judgment of the 190 million pounds reference against Imran and Bushra Bibi until Wednesday. According to the details, a hearing was held in the Islamabad High Court against the old decision of NAB to close the inquiry in the £190 million NAB case, where a two-member bench consisting of Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb and Justice Babar Sattar is hearing the case. At the beginning of today's hearing, PTI's lawyer Salman Safdar argued that the reference hearing against Imran Khan is going on, the last witness who has been 35 witnesses is being questioned on the investigating officer, eight are accused, six are advertisers, two are Mian. The case against the wife is ongoing, the real charge is on the Malik Riaz family, they are advertisers, the founder of PTI was arrested from the Islamabad High Court in the Al-Qadir Trust case, according to NAB, NCA paid 190 million pounds. The money was confiscated, the court declared the other six as admissible for non-appearance.Salman Safdar said that the allegation is that when the petitioner was the prime minister, he facilitated the transfer of 190 million pounds, the case of NAB is that the money was supposed to go to the State Bank, but it came to the account of the Supreme Court. CA was in the middle, NCA gave the money, let them use it wherever they want', on this occasion, Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb inquired that 'did the money go back to the accounts of Malik Riaz and his family?'. "The money was directly transferred to the account of the Supreme Court registrar," the lawyer said.The court inquired that 'the money was returned to Malik Riaz and his family by Britain? On whose behalf was the money sent to Pakistan?', Salman Safdar said that 'the money was returned and to Malik Riaz's family. sent from, Malik Riaz gave land to founder PTI to build Al-Qadir Trust', Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb asked that 'where is this university?', lawyer Salman Safdar replied that 'the university is near Jhelum and is functional'. Advising the arguments, lawyer Salman Safdar said, "We had requested the record of NAB Executive Board meeting in the trial court. The trial court rejected our request to request the record. The trial judge was surprised to reject the request." Write down the reasons, the trial judge wrote that the investigating officer is not the writer or the custodian of this record', later the Islamabad High Court stopped the trial court from pronouncing the final verdict in the 190 million pound case, Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb and A two-member bench comprising Justice Babar Sattar issued a notice to NAB and sought its response.

Brigadier Retired Ghaffar, Brigadier Retired Naeem and Colonel Retired Asim, who were arrested for violation of military discipline, used to work as messengers.

Faiz Hameed case three more retired army officers arrested.

Brigadier Retired Ghaffar, Brigadier Retired Naeem and Colonel Retired Asim, who were arrested for violation of military discipline, used to work as messengers.
Rawalpindi (Newsdesk) Three retired officers are in the custody of the army in connection with the court martial of Lieutenant General retired Faiz Hameed. According to ISPR, the three army officers have been arrested for violating army discipline. The ISPR further said that these three retired army officers used to work as messengers, due to which they have been taken into military custody.

Accountability Action

Accountability action against former ISI chief and retired Lt Gen Faiz Hameed by Pakistan Army under the laws is an unusual act, although the army organization has taken action against its former superior officers before, but this time The accountability process was not purely due to corruption and accusations, but it also has a political background. A senior military officer has already been forced to retire due to his involvement in political matters. It is also not far-fetched that decisions have been made in the posting of many senior officials after reviewing their role in the previous regime.In a sensitive institution like the Pakistan Army, the process of internal monitoring and investigation and action is normal, but it is not heard and publicized. It was not possible to conceal the information regarding Lieutenant General Retired Faiz Hameed because he did not have a clear role but rather Imran Khan Niazi, the founder of Tehreek-e-Insaaf, took the position of DGISI for the stability of his government. Nizan's interest in government information and influencing process was not hidden, on which rightly the impression of Joj's involvement in political affairs started to grow. Had he not been transferred from the post of SI, the situation would have been different.And above all, he had to leave his position and take charge of a new position. This was all political backbiting which was hidden, not clear and was reported in the media, besides his internal affairs, it is impossible to be more detailed and influential. No, despite getting early retirement from the job, even the deviation from the rules set by him has been criticized by the military spokesman himself. It is part of a formal legal complaint in which Lt. Gen. Retd. In the petition filed by Moeez Ahmed Khan, it was stated that on May 12, 2017, on the instructions of the former DGISI, the officials of the secret agency visited the office of Top City andHis house was raided. During the raid, the ISI officials seized a number of valuables including gold, diamonds and sacred money from his house, while the ISI officials also took four crore rupees from him. The same bench of the Supreme Court had ordered an inquiry against Lt. Gen. Retd Faiz Hameed. Following this, the Pakistan Army had formed a committee in April 2024 to investigate the ex-DGISI. Although the fabric of the arrest is similar to the previous government and Tehreek-e-Insaaf, PTI has taken a very careful approach in this regard. It is the army's own will. However, former federal minister Senator Faisal Wauda, ​​who is considered close to Muqtara He claimed that the arrest of Faiz Hameed is just the beginning, many idols are yet to fall. The matter will go far. He further said that the Faizabad sit-in case is very small, now nobody can stop Pakistan from progressing. The matter will not last till the end of the year. The top leadership of PTI is also a part of it. He said that the arrest of General Faiz Hameed has been a great decision for Pakistan.